Panel 2 · Stockholm · 5 October 2026

The Pros and Cons of Merger Control

Moderated by Thibault Schrepel · Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · Stanford Computational Antitrust

The draft Merger Guidelines present themselves as a codification of the case law and the Commission’s decisional practice. Frédéric Jenny and I tested that claim against the full record.

0
published merger decisions
0
judgments of the EU courts
0of 59
paragraphs that state a norm have no anchor in the record

Most of the text passes. The contested provisions do not. They are policy choices written in the voice of settled practice.

Is the change on the table disciplined enough to remain merger control?

Schrepel & Jenny, “Lessons from a Computational Audit of the European Commission’s Draft Merger Guidelines,” SSRN 2026
Panel 2 · The Pros and Cons of Merger Control

Three themes, four answers each

Lars-Hendrik Röller · Nicole Calo-Niiranen · Hans Zenger · Jorge Padilla
01Theme one

What is merger control for?

Competitiveness, industrial policy and the boundary of the objective

Yes or noDoes European competitiveness belong in a merger assessment at all?
02Theme two

Dynamic effects in practice

Counterfactual, evidence and symmetry

Yes or noCan a dynamic efficiency be proven to the standard the draft requires?
03Theme three

Landing the deal

Remedies, investment commitments and predictability

Yes or noShould the Commission clear a merger on the strength of an investment commitment?

Each theme opens with a yes-or-no question, one word per panelist, then three minutes each. Audience questions follow theme three.

→ / space next · ← back · F full screen